《Science China Chemistry》雜志版面費怎么算？

《Science China Chemistry》的版面費計算方法如下：

1.按版面計算：具體版面計算方式可聯(lián)系雜志社或咨詢在線客服。如果文章超出定義范圍則需要多支付一版面的費用。

2.按字數(shù)計算：有些期刊會根據(jù)論文的字數(shù)來計算版面費，例如每千字收取一定費用。

3.額外費用：如果文章需要彩色印刷（如圖表、圖片），可能會額外收取費用。

4.期刊級別和收錄數(shù)據(jù)庫：期刊的級別和被不同數(shù)據(jù)庫收錄的情況也會影響版面費。例如，知網(wǎng)收錄的期刊版面費通常較高。

5.期刊政策與優(yōu)惠：部分期刊可能對特定群體（如學生、學者等）提供版面費優(yōu)惠。

6.開放獲取：開放獲取期刊通常按文章收取費用，費用較高，涵蓋同行評審、編輯、出版和在線傳播等成本。

《Science China Chemistry》雜志的版面費計算方式相對明確，主要依據(jù)文章所占據(jù)的版面數(shù)量進行收費。作者在投稿前，應仔細核對文章字數(shù)，并根據(jù)期刊的收費標準合理預算版面費。

《Science China Chemistry》雜志創(chuàng)刊于1950年，是一本由中國科學院主管、主辦的學術性期刊。該雜志為月刊，審稿周期為預計1-3個月，國內(nèi)統(tǒng)一刊號為11-5838/O6，國際標準刊號為1674-7224。

《Science China Chemistry》雜志的主要欄目包括： 快報、評述、論文，該雜志注重學術性與實踐性結合，鼓勵創(chuàng)新性研究，尤其歡迎具有理論深度或實證價值的論文。其刊載文章多涉及科技政策分析、科技技術應用等熱點議題，為科技工作者提供前沿的學術參考。

該雜志在學術界具有較高影響力，被EI 工程索引(美)、知網(wǎng)收錄(中)、JST 日本科學技術振興機構數(shù)據(jù)庫(日)、CSCD 中國科學引文數(shù)據(jù)庫來源期刊(含擴展版)、上海圖書館館藏、萬方收錄(中)、CA 化學文摘(美)、維普收錄(中)、SCI 科學引文索引(美)、國家圖書館館藏收錄，這意味著論文能夠被更廣泛的學術群體檢索和引用，有助于提升研究成果的傳播范圍和學術影響力。

根據(jù)最新數(shù)據(jù)，其影響因子：1.02，表明該雜志在科技研究領域具有較高的學術認可度。

《Science China Chemistry》雜志須知（審稿周期：預計1-3個月）

Manuscript submission

Please provide in a cover letter the background, innovative and scientific value of the work presented in the manuscript, and authors’ publications related to this work. The detailed contact information of the first author and corresponding author is re-quired. (Please promptly inform the editorial office of any change of contacting emails and addresses.) The authors may

recommend 3–8 qualified reviewers and/or request the exclusion of specific reviewers. An informative cover letter is considered helpful for editors and reviewers to make evaluation of the sub-mitted manuscript.

Duplicate submission is forbidden and unethical. In such cases, the journal will inform the institution of the authors and the relevant journal(s).

Poor English expression of a submitted manuscript may lead to rejection.

Ethical responsibilities of authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of science and the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publica-tion Ethics (COPE), the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.

Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:

1.The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

2.The manuscript has not been published previously (part-ly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”).)

3.A single study is not split up into several parts to in-crease the quantity of submissions and submitted to var-ious journals or to one journal over time (e.g., “sala-mi-publishing”).

4.No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support the conclusions. Upon request au-thors should be prepared to submit relevant documenta-tion or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of, e.g., raw data, samples, and records.

5.No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors’ own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given, in-cluding material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased. Quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions need to be secured for material that is copyrighted.

Important note: The journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

6.Consent to submit, including each version of the paper and any change in authorship, has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/ organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted or re-submitted for publication. In addition, authorship changes or the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requests to add or delete authors at the revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of a written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision whether to accept the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

7.Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and there-fore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.